Scar massage as an intervention for post-surgical scars: A practice survey of Australian hand therapists.

Introduction: Scar massage is a commonly used treatment in hand therapy. The current empirical evidence that supports it is disparate and of variable quality, with no established effective dosage and method proposed. This study aimed to identify the current practice among Australian hand therapists using massage as an intervention for scarring following surgery to the hand and upper limb. Methods: A purposely designed self-report online survey was emailed to current members of the Australian Hand Therapy Association (n = 958). Data collected included demographics, intervention techniques, conditions treated and protocols, scar assessment and knowledge and training about scar massage as a clinical intervention. Results: A total of 116 completed questionnaires were received (a response rate of 12.1%). All respondents used scar massage as part of their clinical practice with 98% to improve soft tissue glide (n = 114), 92% for hypersensitivity (n = 107), and 84% to increase hand function (n = 97). Only 18% (n = 21) of respondents used standardised outcome measures, and most therapists had learned scar massage from a colleague (81%). Conclusions: Commonalities in how respondents implemented scar massage were found. Participants reported relying primarily on clinical experience to inform their practice. Whilst scar massage was widely used, few respondents had received formal skills training or completed outcome measures regularly to formally evaluate its clinical efficacy or impact. Replication of this study with a larger international sample of participants is warranted to determine if these findings reflect general practice.

Is massage an effective intervention in the management of post-operative scarring? A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Scar massage is a widely used treatment modality in hand therapy. This intervention is thoroughly discussed in the literature relating to burns rehabilitation, however, the evidence for its use in treating linear scars following surgery is limited. PURPOSE OF STUDY: To collate the empirical literature on scar massage for the treatment of postsurgical cutaneous scars. STUDY DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, and the Joanna Briggs Institute were searched from inception to December 2020. Two researchers used a data extraction tool to record key demographic, intervention and outcome data, and to apply the Oxford Levels of Evidence for each study. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on a combined sample of 1515 participants. Only two papers addressed hand or wrist scars (92 participants). While all studies reported favorable outcomes for scar massage, there were 45 different outcome measures used and a propensity towards non-standardized assessment. Intervention protocols varied from a single session to three treatments daily for 6 months. The results from 13 studies were confounded by the implementation of additional rehabilitation interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The overall findings suggest that while there may be benefits to scar massage in reducing pain, increasing movement and improving scar characteristics; there is a lack of consistent research methods, intervention protocols and outcome measures. This scoping review highlights the heterogenous nature of research into scar massage following surgery and supports the need for further research to substantiate its use in the clinical setting.

Description and cost-analysis of emergency department attendances for hand and wrist injuries.

BACKGROUND: Injuries to the hand and wrist are estimated to account for between 10% and 30% of all ED presentations. The economic burden placed on the healthcare system can be extensive and rise sharply with increase in injury severity. OBJECTIVES: This cost-analysis was performed with the aim of estimating the economic implications of ED attendances for hand and wrist injuries from the perspective of one Australian public health network. METHODS: Data from two EDs were retrieved from the electronic billing records of one large health network across two financial year periods (2014-2015 and 2015-2016) using ICD-10 codes. All costs that resulted from the treatment of any acute hand or wrist injury across the 2 year period were calculated and are presented by age, sex, injury type and mechanism of injury. RESULTS: A total of 10 024 individuals presented to the two EDs in the 2 year period, accounting for approximately 5.4% of all presentations. The most common presentations were males (62.2%), people aged 25-34 years (26.9%) and lacerations (31.2%). The total cost in the 2 year study period was $3 959 535.38 ($1 923 852.38 in 2014-2015; $2 035 683.00 in 2015-2016). The mean cost per presentation was $383 (95% CI [$373, $393]) in 2014-2015 and $407 (95% CI [$394, $421]) in 2015-2016. CONCLUSIONS: Acute hand and wrist injuries contribute to a significant volume of ED presentations each year in one Australian public health network leading to significant expenditure and health resources. Further research into how to best utilise resources and reduce avoidable injuries should be priority areas to reduce the cost of these injuries to the healthcare system and society.

Orthotic management of fixed flexion deformity of the proximal interphalangeal joint following traumatic injury: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Fixed flexion deformity of the proximal interphalangeal joint can commonly occur following a traumatic injury impacting on hand function and occupational performance. Numerous interventions have been proposed for fixed flexion deformity resolution. This paper investigates the efficacy of static or dynamic orthoses in reducing fixed flexion deformity contracture following traumatic proximal interphalangeal joint injury. METHODS: A multi-database search of three databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE) was conducted. Data extracted for each study were design, patient descriptions, degree of fixed flexion deformity pre- and post-orthoses, and prescribed interventions and exercise programmes. RESULTS: The search yielded 643 studies, of which eight met the inclusion criteria. Studies used heterogeneous methodologies investigating various orthotic interventions. Meta-analysis or pooling of results was not possible. Dissimilar orthotic wear regimes were noted in all studies and an alternative clinical significance outcome was found. CONCLUSION: More research is required to support clinical reasoning in orthotic choice for fixed flexion deformity of the proximal interphalangeal joint post-traumatic injury.